🛍️ May Sale — 20% Off Storewide. Ends May 31.

Free Local Delivery On Orders Above $80 🇸🇬
Free Local Delivery On Orders Above $80 🇸🇬
Free Local Delivery On Orders Above $80 🇸🇬
Ep. 01 — Dr. Sarah Lim on Advanced Skincare

Ep. 01 — Dr. Sarah Lim on Advanced Skincare

in The Fypirl Show

 

Dr. Lim described it as one of the most versatile and well-tolerated active ingredients available, with strong evidence for addressing pigmentation, supporting the skin barrier, regulating sebum production, and reducing the appearance of enlarged pores. It works at concentrations as low as two percent, it is stable, it layers well with most other ingredients, and it is available at accessible price points across multiple brands.

Her observation was that niacinamide does not trend the way newer ingredients do because it does not have the same dramatic before-and-after narrative. But for someone building a long-term skincare routine, she would consider it a foundational ingredient alongside SPF and a good moisturiser.

Related Posts

Ep. 02 — Marcus Tan on Building Creator-Led Brands

Ep. 02 — Marcus Tan on Building Creator-Led Brands

Marcus spent a significant portion of the session on what he described as the fundamental misunderstanding that brands bring into creator partnerships — and it comes down to what they think they are paying for. Most brands, he explained, approach a creator partnership as a media buy. They are purchasing reach. They want a number of eyeballs exposed to their product for a given fee, and they measure success by impressions and click-through rates. That model works for awareness. It does not build anything durable. What creators actually sell — and what the most sophisticated brand-creator partnerships understand — is borrowed trust. The audience trusts the creator, and a genuine endorsement transfers a portion of that trust to the product. But trust cannot be rented the way reach can. It has to be earned through authentic alignment between the creator's actual values and the product they are putting their name behind. When that alignment is absent, the audience senses it immediately. The comment section knows before the analytics do. And once a creator has been perceived as selling out, the trust damage extends to every brand they work with afterward — which is why the best creators are increasingly selective in ways that frustrate brand marketing teams who are used to treating the arrangement as a straightforward transaction.

Learn more
Ep. 03 — Chloe Wong Reviews Viral Beauty Products

Ep. 03 — Chloe Wong Reviews Viral Beauty Products

  Chloe opened the session with this line and then immediately qualified it in a way that made it more interesting rather than less. She was not saying viral products do not work. She was saying that virality and efficacy are measured by entirely different systems and almost never in conversation with each other. A product goes viral because of a moment — a transformation, a texture, a claim, a creator reaction — that is optimised for a three-second hook on a vertical video format. Whether that product then delivers on the promise of that moment for a specific skin type, used consistently over a realistic time period, under real conditions — that is an entirely different question that most viral content has neither the format nor the incentive to answer. What Chloe does is answer the second question. Which is why the room was full before she had opened a single product.

Learn more
Ep. 04 — Daniel Lee on Wellness and Performance

Ep. 04 — Daniel Lee on Wellness and Performance

Daniel opened with this and the room understood immediately why it needed to be the first thing said. The wellness industry is worth hundreds of billions of dollars globally. That number exists because somewhere between genuine health interest and aggressive marketing, wellness shifted from being a set of practices — things you do consistently over time — into a set of products — things you buy, try, and replace when the next thing arrives. The content ecosystem around wellness accelerates this cycle because novelty generates engagement and consistency does not. A video about a supplement stack you have been taking for three years with measurable results is less interesting to an algorithm than a video about the new biohacking protocol a founder swears changed his life in two weeks. Daniel's position was not that products are irrelevant to wellness. It was that the content environment around wellness has systematically inverted the relationship between practice and product — and most people consuming that content are spending money solving problems that could be addressed first through behavioural change that costs nothing. He said this without judgment. He said it as someone who had made the same mistake himself before understanding it clearly enough to describe it to a room full of people.

Learn more

Leave a comment